[emacs-berlin] thank you for the feedback!

[Dieter Klünter]

Am Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:31:39 +0200
schrieb Tilmann Singer <tils at tils.net>:

> Does anybody here have experience setting up and in particular tuning
> a jitsi-meet server? I have set up one on an AWS m5.large instance so
> far, and had mixed success for group chats of around 5 people with it.
> Sometimes video was a bit laggy, hard to say what the bottleneck was
> and if a larger instance would have helped.
> 
> I can offer to host an experiment on:
> Wednesday April 1st, 19:00
> (exactly one week after the latest regular meetup)
> 
> However, help with configuring the thing would be highly appreciated.
> And if someone has an optimized server, feel free to offer that.
> 
> As before, if it can be proven to work, I'm fine switching to jitsi,
> if not, I'd also be fine to continue using zoom (when it's possible
> to use the browser based client).

On the weekend I have set up jitsi-meet on a Debian partition, no
particular measuring yet. But I will report test results.

an anouncement from Chaos Computer Club: 
https://events.ccc.de/2020/03/29/hidden-service-ein-digital-verteiltes-online-chaos/

Report from TUM Munich: up to 60 participants, minimum 8 core cpu's,
32Gb ram, 1Gb ethernet
TUM is experimenting with Matrix, which uses Jitsi for video streaming.
https://matrix.org/
Firefox is not able to handle  WEBRTC, thus chromium/chrome browser
required.

-Dieter

-- 
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://sys4.de
GPG Key ID: E9ED159B
53°37'09,95"N
10°08'02,42"E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
URL: <http://mailb.org/pipermail/emacs-berlin/attachments/20200330/c81cfcea/attachment.sig>