[emacs-berlin] Upcoming meetup: full summer mode
Jack Rusher
jackrusher at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 18:10:07 UTC 2015
How late do you expect to stay tonight? I can head that way now.
J.
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 19:12, C. Florian Ebeling <florian.ebeling at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That I can rules out I believe, as my project doesn’t use any commit hooks. (No global one either.) Thanks for the idea.
>
> Florian
>
>
>> On 29 Jul 2015, at 17:29, Diez B. Roggisch <deets at web.de> wrote:
>>
>> One reason for a slowdown could be that now magit issues a
>>
>> git --no-pager -c core.preloadindex=true commit —
>>
>> before each commit, and similar commands. I’m not 100% sure, but it looks to me as if this runs githooks you might have installed - very often. This slows things down for me (but not unbearably), and otherwise I’m quite happy with magit.
>>
>> Diez
>>
>>
>>> On 27 Jul 2015, at 15:20, Lefteris Karapetsas <lefteris at refu.co> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have had the same positive experience with magit 2.1. It feels faster to me than its predecessor. On the other hand a colleague of mine reported similar problems with the ones Florian reported. I wonder why that happens.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lefteris(Eleftherios) Karapetsas
>>> Click here for my CV/portfolio website
>>> Also maintain a blog on various topics, mostly engineering
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Tilmann Singer <tils at tils.net> wrote:
>>>> "C. Florian Ebeling" <florian.ebeling at gmail.com> writes:
>>>> For me the experience with magit 2.1 has been mixed. It’s slow for my
>>>> main projects right now, to the point where it’s not really usable.
>>>> Did you see anything like that? I know there to be a ticket for it
>>>> already [1], apparently not everyone has this problem.
>>>
>>> No, I was lucky enough to not have any performance problems with it yet.
>>> I had problems with the old magit, where expanding a very large diff
>>> would sometimes "crash" magit, and prevent any further interaction with
>>> magit, requiring a re-opening of the magit buffer. I haven't seen that
>>> yet with the new version, although I visited a few large diffs already.
>>> No systematic evidence though.
>>>
>>>
>>> cheers, Til
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> emacs-berlin mailing list
>>> emacs-berlin at emacs-berlin.org
>>> https://mailb.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-berlin
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> emacs-berlin mailing list
>>> emacs-berlin at emacs-berlin.org
>>> https://mailb.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-berlin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> emacs-berlin mailing list
>> emacs-berlin at emacs-berlin.org
>> https://mailb.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-berlin
>
> _______________________________________________
> emacs-berlin mailing list
> emacs-berlin at emacs-berlin.org
> https://mailb.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-berlin
More information about the emacs-berlin
mailing list