<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I just found some forum post confirming Dieters remark about Firefox.<div class=""><a href="https://community.jitsi.org/t/server-load-for-many-simultaneous-meetings/23877" class="">https://community.jitsi.org/t/server-load-for-many-simultaneous-meetings/23877</a><br class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">If all of them are Chrome (simulcast) and let’s say all participants in a
meeting are sending video you need at least 100Mbit upload/download per
meeting and those numbers drastically increase if adding just one
non-simulcast participant (Firefox at the moment, but we will soon
change that :))</blockquote>(The numbers refer to 20 meetings with 20 participants each)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">So it seems like it should be Chromium/Chrome.</div><div class="">Chromium can be downloaded here: <a href="https://chromium.woolyss.com/download/" class="">https://chromium.woolyss.com/download/</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">My comment regarding Chrome was aimed at using jitsi because it is free and open, so from this perspective it is not ideal to then use Chrome as a browser – this of course is an individual choice.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Other than that regarding Ilia’s question I think Andreas is right. In theory though it might compromise the group in terms of tracking / data collection … but this is another story. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">- Micha</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>