<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11.05.2016 14:55, Arne Brasseur
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAK2o9W+17NkTJ6c-A-SCN0tKzwObUymPa1MjWy=ZTk57JsLTZw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 11 May 2016 at 14:35, Rasmus <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:rasmus@gmx.us" target="_blank">rasmus@gmx.us</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for
the link. Tramp is pretty cool.<br>
<span class=""><br>
> #+NAME: build-new-uberjar<br>
> #+BEGIN_SRC sh :var VERSION=current-version :dir /<br>
><br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ssh%3Aroot@lambdaisland.com">ssh:root@lambdaisland.com</a>|<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sudo:web@lambdaisland.com:/var/web/app">sudo:web@lambdaisland.com:/var/web/app</a>
:results<br>
> scalar<br>
<br>
</span>Aside: ob-sh is now ob-shell.<br>
<br>
Personally, those long lines babel lines are too complex for
me, so I like<br>
to use the header keywords.<br>
<br>
#+header: :var version="1"<br>
#+header: :dir "/tmp"<br>
#+header: :results table<br>
#+begin_src shell<br>
echo $version, $(pwd)<br>
#+end_src<br>
<br>
#+RESULTS:<br>
| 1 | /tmp |<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Rasmus<br>
</font></span><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
interesting video, thanks Arne. Nonetheless have to shed some water
into the wine:<br>
<br>
As we've seen it's possible - but is it really easier then using a
plain shell?<br>
<br>
Also: it isolates your setup and configuration from that of your
colleagues - in case its author is absent, it will be hard to take
over for the others in an enterprise. <br>
<br>
And some more basic concern: the underlying literate programming
paradigm seems pointless WRT examples given in video. Why comments
in natural languages should be preferable over code? Code has the
purpose to be less ambiguous, it's a kind of math. While natural
language gives way to interpretation, i.e. misunderstanding of all
kind. Maybe literate programming was of interest in earlier times in
a world of low level coding. Higher languages are adapted at human
mind, let's use them.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Andreas<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>